Validation of Diabetes Prediction Scores: Does adding a high risk for depression increase the area under the curve?

Author:

Salinero-Fort MAORCID,Mostaza J,Lahoz C,Cárdenas-Valladolid J,Iriarte-Campo V,Estirado-de Cabo E,García-Iglesias F,González-Alegre T,Fernández-Puntero B,Cornejo-del Río V,Sánchez-Arroyo V,Sabín-Rodriguez C,López-López S,Gómez-Campelo P,Taulero-Escalera B,Rodriguez-Artalejo F,San Andrés-Rebollo FJ,de Burgos-Lunar C

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDiabetes risk scores include age, waist circumference, body mass index, hypertension, use of blood pressure medication, and metabolic and lifestyle variables. Although patients with major depressive disorder have a higher risk of diabetes, none of the diabetes risk scores includes high risk of depression as an additional item.AimTo validate three diabetes risk scores (FINDRISC, DESIR, ADA) in the Spanish population aged >45 years with the aim of predicting diabetes and to test the value of adding high risk of depression, defined as a PHQ-9 questionnaire score ≥10, to the risk score with the best discriminative performance.MethodsProspective population-based cohort study in Madrid (Spain). FINDRISC, DESIR, ADA, PHQ-9, and OGTT values were measured at baseline. Participants with OGTT <200 mg/dl (n= 1,242) were followed up for a median of 7.3 years using their general practitioner’s electronic health record (EHR) and telephone contact. Incident diabetes was identified as treatment for diabetes, fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dl, a new diagnosis in the EHR, or self-reported diagnosis. At the end of the study, the performance of diabetes risk scores, including a modified original FINDRISC score with a new variable for high risk of depression (FINDRISC-MOOD), was assessed.ResultsDuring follow-up, 104 (8.4%; 95% CI, 6.8-9.9) participants developed diabetes, and 185 had a PHQ-9 score ≥10. The AUROC values were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.72) for FINDRISC-MOOD and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.65-0.71) for the original FINDRISC. The AUROC for DESIR and ADA were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.68) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.69), respectively. There were no significant differences in the AUROC between FINDRISC-MOOD and the remaining scores.ConclusionFINDRISC-MOOD performed slightly better than the other risk scores, although the differences were not significant. FINDRISC-MOOD could be used to identify the risk of future diabetes.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3