Abstract
AbstractThe 2017 study by Reddyet aldescribed the comprehensive characterization of somatic drivers of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using whole exome sequencing.1After additional large studies relying on exome or whole genome sequencing were published, several oddities unique to the Reddy results have emerged. Seeking to explain the discrepancies, we reanalyzed their data using established open-source pipelines. This revealed thousands of mutations that could not be independently reproduced by these pipelines and a larger set of high-quality mutations that were not reported by Reddy. This caused an artificial under-representation of the mutation prevalence in many genes including clinically relevant hot spots affectingEZH2andCD79B. More generally, the study had an under-representation of mutations in DLBCL genes that disproportionately affected genes known to have the highest mutation rates. The missing variants and the spurious variants can be attributed to distinct problems with the analytical approaches employed in that study. Our analysis also identified strong associations between mutations and patient outcome includingTP53, KMT2DandPIM1, which were not found in the Reddy study. Overall, we demonstrate that this combination of errors influenced many of the central novel findings from their study rendering their results largely non-replicable. The full results of our analyses are included as supplemental items as a resource for other researchers with an interest in the genetics of B-cell lymphomas.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献