ADP release can explain spatially-dependent kinesin binding times

Abstract

AbstractThe self-organization of cells relies on the profound complexity of protein-protein interactions. Challenges in directly observing these events have hindered progress toward understanding their diverse behaviors. One notable example is the interaction between molecular motors and cytoskeletal systems that combine to perform a variety of cellular functions. In this work, we leverage theory and experiments to identify and quantify the rate-limiting mechanism of the initial association between a cargo-bound kinesin motor and a microtubule track. Recent advances in optical tweezers provide binding times for several lengths of kinesin motors trapped at varying distances from a microtubule, empowering the investigation of competing models. We first explore a diffusion-limited model of binding. Through Brownian dynamics simulations and simulation-based inference, we find this simple diffusion model fails to explain the experimental binding times, but an extended model that accounts for the ADP state of the molecular motor agrees closely with the data, even under the scrutiny of penalizing for additional model complexity. We provide quantification of both kinetic rates and biophysical parameters underlying the proposed binding process. Our model suggests that most but not every motor binding event is limited by their ADP state. Lastly, we predict how these association rates can be modulated in distinct ways through variation of environmental concentrations and spatial distances.Significance StatementCytoskeletal-motor assemblies self-organize to achieve cellular functions ranging from delivering intracellular cargoes to generating forces in mitosis. Advancements in single-molecule experiments have revealed immense detail about motor detachment and stepping, but relatively little regarding the attachment process. With newly available spatially parameterized motor binding times from an optical trap, the evaluation of mechanistic models for binding becomes possible. We find that a model limited by both diffusive search and ADP-release best explains the data. The coupled chemo-mechanical nature of this interaction is more malleable than either separately, possibly explaining the rich diversity and regulation observed in cells. More broadly, our study provides a timely vignette on leveraging computations with experiments to understand how geometry and other complexities shape protein-protein interactions.