Abstract
AbstractThe promise of biotechnology is tempered by its potential for accidental or deliberate misuse. Reliably identifying telltale signatures characteristic to different genetic designers, termed genetic engineering attribution, would deter misuse, yet is still considered unsolved. Here, we show that recurrent neural networks trained on DNA motifs and basic phenotype can reach 70% attribution accuracy distinguishing between over 1,300 labs. To make these models usable in practice, we introduce a framework for weighing predictions against other investigative evidence using calibration, and bring our model to within 1.6% of perfect calibration. Additionally, we demonstrate that simple models can accurately predict both the nation-state-of-origin and ancestor labs, forming the foundation of an integrated attribution toolkit which should promote responsible innovation and international security alike.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference61 articles.
1. Engelberg, S. New Evidence Adds Doubt to FBI’s Case Against Anthrax Suspect — ProPublica. ProPublica https://www.propublica.org/article/new-evidence-disputes-case-against-bruce-e-ivins (2011).
2. Skane, W. Science Alone Does Not Establish Source of Anthrax Used in 2001 Mailings. http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=13098 (2011).
3. Microbial Forensics--"Cross-Examining Pathogens"
4. Building Microbial Forensics as a Response to Bioterrorism
5. Shane, S. & Wade, N. Pressure Grows for F.B.I.’s Anthrax Evidence. NY Times (2008).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献