Abstract
AbstractThe treatment of complex diseases often relies on combinatorial therapy, a strategy where drugs are used to target multiple genes simultaneously. Promising candidate genes for combinatorial perturbation often constitute epistatic genes, i.e., genes which contribute to a phenotype in a non-linear fashion. Experimental identification of the full landscape of genetic interactions by perturbing all gene combinations is prohibitive due to the exponential growth of testable hypotheses. Here we present a model for the inference of pairwise epistatic, including synthetic lethal, gene interactions from siRNA-based perturbation screens. The model exploits the combinatorial nature of siRNA-based screens resulting from the high numbers of sequence-dependent off-target effects, where each siRNA apart from its intended target knocks down hundreds of additional genes. We show that conditional and marginal epistasis can be estimated as interaction coefficients of regression models on perturbation data. We compare two methods, namely glinternet and xyz, for selecting non-zero effects in high dimensions as components of the model, and make recommendations for the appropriate use of each. For data simulated from real RNAi screening libraries, we show that glinternet successfully identifies epistatic gene pairs with high accuracy across a wide range of relevant parameters for the signal-to-noise ratio of observed phenotypes, the effect size of epistasis and the number of observations per double knockdown. xyz is also able to identify interactions from lower dimensional data sets (fewer genes), but is less accurate for many dimensions. Higher accuracy of glinternet, however, comes at the cost of longer running time compared to xyz. The general model is widely applicable and allows mining the wealth of publicly available RNAi screening data for the estimation of epistatic interactions between genes. As a proof of concept, we apply the model to search for interactions, and potential targets for treatment, among previously published sets of siRNA perturbation screens on various pathogens. The identified interactions include both known epistatic interactions as well as novel findings.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference39 articles.
1. Ashworth, A , CJ Lord , and JS Reis-Filho (2011). “Genetic Interactions in Cancer Progression and Treatment”. Cell.
2. Beerenwinkel, N , L Pachter , and B Sturmfels (2007). “Epistasis and Shapes of Fitness Land-scapes”. Statistica Sinica.
3. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
4. Chan, DA and AJ Giaccia (2011). “Harnessing Synthetic Lethal Interactions in Anticancer Drug Discovery.” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
5. Cordell, HJ (2002). “Epistasis: What It Means, What It Doesn’t Mean, and Statistical Methods to Detect It in Humans.” Human molecular genetics.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献