Genomic assessment of within-host population variation in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Implications for gonorrhoea transmission

Author:

Ashcroft Melinda M.ORCID,Chow Eric P. F.ORCID,Lee Darren Y.J.,De Petra Vesna,Soumilas Maree,Tschaepe Marlene,Zhang LeiORCID,Ingle Danielle J.ORCID,Taiaroa George,Hicks Allison L.ORCID,Grad Yonatan H.ORCID,Howden Benjamin P.ORCID,Fairley Christopher K.ORCID,Williamson Deborah A.ORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectivesMathematical modelling and genomic analyses are powerful methods for investigating the transmission dynamics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, however, often make the implicit assumption that N. gonorrhoeae isolates at different anatomical sites within the same individual are the same strain.MethodsIn this study, two approaches were used to explore genetic diversity. First, we examined a collection of stored, clinical N. gonorrhoeae isolates sourced from multiple anatomical sites of single individuals attending a sexual health clinic in Melbourne from 2011-2019. Second, we obtained multiple colony picks from primary clinical samples from individuals attending a sexual health clinic in Melbourne from 2019-2020. Whole genome sequencing and a variety of bioinformatics approaches were used to determine both within-host and within-sample genetic diversity.ResultsThirty-seven individuals were identified that had cultured N. gonorrhoeae from two or more anatomical sites (urogenital, anorectal, or oropharyngeal), with a final dataset of 105 isolates. In 35/37 (94.6%) individuals, infections were highly similar at the genetic level, with identical MLST and NG-MAST profiles. Pairwise comparisons of isolates within each individual indicated that the maximum within-host pairwise SNP distance was 13 SNPs (median = 1, IQR: 0-3). Notably, four distinct multi-individual phylogenetic clusters were identified, where the maximum pairwise SNP distance was 19 SNPs (median = 6, IQR = 2-11). Similarly, comparisons of isolates within each primary sample indicated that the maximum pairwise SNP distance was 8 SNPs (median = 2, IQR:1-3).ConclusionsThis study suggests that in most cases of multi-site infection, the same strain of N. gonorrhoeae causes the infection at each anatomical site. However, WGS data alone cannot differentiate between the same infecting strain or (re)infections from the same transmission network. These data guide recommendations regarding optimal bioinformatic approaches to infer genetic relatedness of N. gonorrhoeae and will help inform future studies of gonorrhoea transmission and epidemiology.KEY MESSAGESIn most cases of multi-site infection, the same strain of N. gonorrhoeae causes infection at each anatomical site (urogenital, anorectal, and oropharyngeal) within an individual.It is not possible, using genomics alone, to determine if an infection is from a single individual or multiple individuals within the same sexual network.Current literature reports an array of different bioinformatic methods for describing genetic diversity, highlighting that SNP thresholds are not directly transferable between studies.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference49 articles.

1. Sexually transmitted diseases and infertility

2. National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Notifications for all disease by state and territory and year. National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System, Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Canberra, Australia. 2019 [Available from: http://www9.health.gov.au/cda/source/cda-index.cfm accessed January 07 2020].

3. Lahra MM , Enriquez RP , National Neisseria N. Australian Gonococcal Surveillance Programme annual report, 2015. Common Dis Intell Q Rep 2017;41(1):E. [published Online First: 2017/04/08]

4. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Report on global sexually transmitted infection surveillance., 2018.

5. Improving Control of Antibiotic-Resistant Gonorrhea by Integrating Research Agendas Across Disciplines: Key Questions Arising From Mathematical Modeling

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3