Widespread decline in plant diversity across six decades

Author:

David EichenbergORCID,Bowler Diana E.ORCID,Aletta BonnORCID,Helge BruelheideORCID,Volker GreschoORCID,David HarterORCID,Ute JandtORCID,Rudolf May,Marten WinterORCID,Florian JansenORCID

Abstract

AbstractBased on plant occurrence data covering all parts of Germany, we investigated changes in the distribution of 2146 plant species between 1960 and 2017. We analyzed 29 million occurrence records over an area of ∼350.000 km2 on a 5 × 5 km grid using temporal and spatio-temporal models and accounting for sampling bias. Since the 1960s, more than 70% of investigated plant species showed significant declines in nation-wide occurrence. Archaeophytes (species introduced before 1492) most strongly declined but also native plant species experienced severe declines. In contrast, neophytes (species introduced after 1492) increased in their nation-wide occurrence but not homogeneously throughout the country. Our analysis suggests that the strongest declines in native species already happened in the 1960s-80s, a time frame in which usually few data exist. Increases in neophytic species were strongest in the 1990s and 2010s. Overall, the increase in neophytes did not compensate for the loss of other species, resulting in a decrease in mean grid-cell species-richness of -1.9% per decade. The decline in plant biodiversity is a widespread phenomenon occurring in different habitats and geographic regions. It is likely that this decline has major repercussions on ecosystem functioning and overall biodiversity, potentially with cascading effects across trophic levels. The approach used in this study is transferable to large-scale trend analyses using heterogeneous occurrence data.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference81 articles.

1. August, T. A. (2015). ‘sparta-Species Presence / Absence R Trends Analyses’, 1–34.

2. Benkert, D. , Fukarek, F. , & Korsch, H. (1996). Verbreitungsatlas der Farn-und Blutenpflanzen Ostdeutschlands. Jenba, Stuttgart, Lübeck, Ulm: G. Fischer.

3. Bergmeier, E. (1992). Grundlagen und Methoden floristischer Kartierung in Deutschland: eine Veröffentlichung der Zentralstelle für die Floristische Kartierung in Deutschland. Beiheft, 2nd ed. Goltze.

4. Bijlsma, R. (2013). ‘The estimation of species richness of Dutch bryophytes between 1900 and 2011 Documentation of VBA-procedures based on the Frescalo program’, 15/March: 1–44.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3