1. Hanson, K. E. et al. Self-Collected Anterior Nasal and Saliva Specimens versus Healthcare Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2. doi :10.1101/2020.07.17.20155754.
2. Wyllie, A. L. et al. Saliva is more sensitive for SARS-CoV-2 detection in COVID-19 patients than nasopharyngeal swabs. medRxiv (2020).
3. Byrne, R. L. , Kay, G. A. , Kontogianni, K. , Brown, L. & Collins, A. M. Saliva offers a sensitive, specific and non-invasive alternative to upper respiratory swabs for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. medRxiv (2020).
4. Effect of handling and storage conditions and stabilizing agent on the recovery of viral RNA from oral fluid of pigs;J. Virol. Methods,2014
5. Strugnell, B. & Thirsk, V. L. A. Final Report for BPEX Project: Evaluation of a PCR assay for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory virus in oral fluids from growing pigs and its applications for diagnosis and surveillance in the UK pig industry. https://pork.ahdb.org.uk/media/2687/evaluation-of-a-pcr-assay-for-porcine-reproductive-and-respiratory-virus-in-oral-fluids.pdf x(April/May 2010).