Author:
Sparks R.S.J.,Aspinall W.P.,Brooks-Pollock E.,Cooke R.M.,Danon L.,Barclay J.,Scarrow J.H.,Cox J.H.
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundContact patterns are the drivers of close-contacts infections, such as COVID-19. In an effort to control COVID-19 transmission in the UK, schools were closed on 23 March 2020. With social distancing in place, Primary Schools were partially re-opened on 1 June 2020, with plans to fully re-open in September 2020. The impact of social distancing and risk mitigation measures on children’s contact patterns is not known.MethodsWe conducted a structured expert elicitation of a sample of Primary Headteachers to quantify contact patterns within schools in pre-COVID-19 times and how these patterns were expected to change upon re-opening. Point estimates with uncertainty were determined by a formal performance-based algorithm. Additionally, we surveyed school Headteachers about risk mitigation strategies and their anticipated effectiveness.ResultsExpert elicitation provides estimates of contact patterns that are consistent with contact surveys. We report mean number of contacts per day for four cohorts within schools along with a range at 90% confidence for the variations of contacts among individuals. Prior to lockdown, we estimate that, mean numbers per day, younger children (Reception and Year 1) made 15 contacts [range 8..35] within school, older children (Year 6) 18 contacts [range 5.. 55], teaching staff 25 contacts [range 4.. 55) and non-classroom staff 11 contacts [range 2.. 27]. Compared to pre-COVID times, after schools re-opened the mean number of contacts were reduced by about 53% for young children, about 62% for older children, about 60% for classroom staff and about 64% for other staff. Contacts between teaching and non-teaching staff reduced by 80%, which is consistent with other independent estimates. The distributions of contacts per person are asymmetric indicating a heavy tail of individuals with high contact numbers.ConclusionsWe interpret the reduction in children’s contacts as a consequence of efforts to reduce mixing with interventions such as forming groups of children (bubbles) who are organized to learn together to limit contacts. Distributions of contacts for children and adults can be used to inform COVID-19 transmission modelling. Our findings suggest that while official DfE guidelines form the basis for risk mitigation in schools, individual schools have adopted their own bespoke strategies, often going beyond the guidelines.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference26 articles.
1. Anticipated impacts of Brexit scenarios on UK food prices and implications for policies on poverty and health: a structured expert judgement approach
2. 2020 Hand Hygiene Practices and the Risk of Human Coronavirus Infections in a UK Community Cohort;Flu Watch Group;Wellcome Open Research,2020
3. Beshearse E et al. (in press) Attribution of Illnesses Transmitted Commonly by Food and Water in the United States to Comprehensive Transmission Pathways using Structured Expert Judgment. Emerging Infectious Diseases, Manuscript ID EID-20-0316).
4. Brooks-Pollock E , Read JM , House T , Medley GF , Keeling MJ , Danon L . (2020a) The Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) of cases due to gatherings and groups with relevance to COVID-19 mitigation strategies.
5. Brooks-Pollock Read JM , Keeling MJ , Danon L . (2020b) Adherence to physical distancing dominates the impact re-opening schools on SARS-CoV-2 transmission Paper to SPI-M.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献