Abstract
AbstractIn recent years there has been a growing body of research on human resilience to extreme climatic shifts in the past. Most studies focus on comparing archaeological records prior to a perceived climatic shift with those after it, to investigate a causal relationship between the two. Although these comparisons are important, they are limited in their potential to facilitate causal understanding of the factors that determined the human response to climate change. We assert that for such understanding, it is necessary to explicitly consider prior processes that could have made certain populations more resilient to the extreme climatic shift. This assertion calls for a new focus on the cultural and demographicdynamicsin prehistorical populations, over the generations thatprecededthe climatic shift. In this article, we lay out several mechanisms of cultural evolution that – together with the experienced climatic dynamics prior to extreme climatic shifts – may have determined populations’ abilities to cope with them. This endeavor allows us to outline alternative hypotheses regarding what determined the fate of different human groups. These, in turn, may help direct the collection and analysis of archaeological data and to highlight modalities within it that may be helpful for inference of the mechanisms that determined populations’ resilience to climatic shifts.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference46 articles.
1. Climate change and cultural response around 4000 cal yr B.P. in the western part of Chinese Loess Plateau;Quaternary Research,2005
2. Cultural specialization as a double-edged sword: division into specialized guilds might promote cultural complexity at the cost of higher susceptibility to cultural loss;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B,2023
3. Modelling effects of inter-group contact on links between population size and cultural complexity;Biology Letters,2023
4. Ancient DNA, kinship and relational identities in Bronze Age Britain;A stranger in a strange land: a perspective on archaeological responses to the palaeogenetic revolution from an archaeologist working amongst palaeogeneticists. World Archaeol. 51, 586–601 (2019).Brück, J;Antiquity,2021
5. Boserup, E. (1976). Environment, population, and technology in primitive societies. Population and Development Review, 21–36.