Abstract
SummaryMore than 15% of all vascular plant species may remain scientifically undescribed, and many of the >340,000 described species have no or few geographic records documenting their distribution. Identifying and understanding taxonomic and geographic knowledge shortfalls is key to prioritising future collection and conservation efforts.Using extensive data for 343,523 vascular plant species and time-to-event analyses, we conducted multiple tests related to plant taxonomic and geographic data shortfalls, and identified 32 global diversity darkspots (regions predicted to lack most information about their species diversity and distribution). We defined priority regions for future collection according to several socio-economic and environmental scenarios.Most plant diversity darkspots are found within biodiversity hotspots, except New Guinea. We identify New Guinea, the Philippines, Borneo, Myanmar, India, Turkey, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, as global collection priorities under all environmental and socio-economic conditions considered.Our study provides a framework to accelerate plant species documentation for the implementation of conservation actions. As digitisation of the world’s herbaria progresses, collection and conservation priorities may soon be identifiable at finer scales.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference65 articles.
1. Plant scientists’ research attention is skewed towards colourful, conspicuous and broadly distributed flowers;Nature Plants,2021
2. Antonelli A , Smith RJ , Fry C , Simmonds MSJ , Kersey PJ , Pritchard HW , Abbo MS , Acedo C , Adams J, A. M. A , et al. 2020. State of the World’s Plants and Fungi. Royal Botanic Gardens (Kew); Sfumato Foundation.
3. Predicting unknown species numbers using discovery curves
4. On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species
5. Brummitt RK . 2001. World geographical scheme for recording plant distributions (HI for Botanical Documentation, Ed.). Pittsburgh, Pa.: Published for the International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences (TDWG) by the Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献