A prediction algorithm to improve the accuracy of the Gold Standard Framework Surprise Question end-of-life prognostic categories in an acute hospital admission cohort-controlled study. The Proactive Risk-Based and Data-Driven Assessment of Patients at the End of Life (PRADA)

Author:

Singh BaldevORCID,Kumari-Dewat NishaORCID,Ryder AdamORCID,Klaire Vijay,Bennion Gemma,Jennens Hannah,Matthews Dawn,Rayner Sophie,Ritzenthaler Benoit,Shears Jean,Ahmed Kamran,Sidhu Mona,Viswanath Ananth,Warren Kate,Parry Emma

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the accuracy of a clinical data algorithm allocated end-of-life prognosis amongst hospital inpatients.MethodThe model allocated a predicted Gold Standard Framework end-of-life prognosis to all acute medical patients admitted over a 2-year period. Mortality was determined at 1 year.ResultsOf 18,838 patients, end-of-life prognosis was unknown in 67.9%. A binary logistic regression model calculated 1-year mortality probability (X2=6650.2, p<0.001, r2= 0.43). Probability cut off points were used to triage those with unknown prognosis using the GSF Surprise Question “Yes” or “No” survival categories (> or < 1 year respectively), with subsidiary classification of “No” to Green (months), Amber (weeks) or Red (days). This digitally driven prognosis allocation (100% vs baseline 32.1%) yielded cohorts of GSFSQ-Yes 15,264 (81%), GSFSQ-No Green 1,771 (9.4%) and GSFSQ-No Amber or Red 1,803 (9.6%).There were 5,043 (26.8%) deaths at 1 year. In Cox’s survival, model allocated cohorts were discrete for mortality (GSFSQ-Yes 16.4% v GSFSQ-No 71.0% (p<0.001). For the GSFSQ-No classification, the mortality Odds Ratio was 12.4 (11.4 – 13.5) (p<0.001) vs GSFSQ-Yes (c-statistic of 0.71 (0.70 – 0.73), p<0.001; accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of 81.2%, 83.6%, 83.6% respectively. If this tool had been utilised at the time of admission, the potential to reduce subsequent hospital admissions, death-in-hospital, and bed days was all p<0.001.ConclusionsThe defined model successfully allocated end-of-life prognosis in cohorts of hospitalised patients with strong performance metrics for prospective 1 year mortality, yielding the potential to provide anticipatory care and improve outcomes.What is already known about this topic?End-of-life care is fragmented with excessive hospital admission and death in hospital. Current processes to determine end-of-life prognosis and promote anticipatory care for better outcomes are of limited utility.What this paper adds?A patient centric data integration model permitted the development of a digital health care system (PRADA) which allows the use of advanced analytics to accurately determine end-of-life prognosis among those where it was otherwise unknown. This paper demonstrates the potential benefit of integrating this prediction tool into routine care, at scale, in large population-level cohorts.Implications for practice, theory, or policyIn an era of advancing opportunity from informatics driven heath care, NHS policy, through commissioning to direct care, must now actively deploy such evidence-based digital systems into direct care, most specifically in data sharing across provider boundaries. We particularly hope the research community might consider testing and validating this approach.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference40 articles.

1. NHS England. The NHS Long Term Plan. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/nhs-long-term-plan-version-1.2.pdf. Accessed 05.09.2023.

2. Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings

3. Death within 1 year among emergency medical admissions to Scottish hospitals: incident cohort study

4. Public Health England. Emergency admissions in the 3 months before death. 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emergency-admissions-in-the-3-months-before-death/emergency-admissions-in-the-3-months-before-death. Accessed 05.09.2023.

5. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3