Predicting the responses in colour matching experiments from the symmetries of colour space

Author:

Vattuone NicolásORCID,Samengo InésORCID

Abstract

In conceptual spaces, the distance between concepts is represented by a metric that cannot usually be expressed as a function of a few, salient physical properties of the represented items. For example, the space of colours can be endowed with a metric capturing the degree to which two chromatic stimuli are perceived as different. As many optical illusions have shown, the colour with which a stimulus is perceived depends, among other contextual factors, on the chromaticity of its surround, an effect called “chromatic induction”. Heuristically, the surround pushes the colour of the stimulus away from its own chromaticity, increasing the salience of the boundary. Previous studies have described how the magnitude of the push depends on the chromaticity of both the stimulus and the surround, concluding that the space of colours contains anisotropies and inhomogeneities. The importance of contextuality has cast doubt on the practical or predictive utility of perceptual metrics, beyond a mathematical curiosity. Here we provide evidence that the metric structure of the space of colours is indeed useful and has predictive power. By using a notion of distance between colours emerging from a subjective metric, we show that the anisotropies and inhomogeneities reported in previous studies can be eliminated. The resulting symmetry allows us to derive a universal curve for the average chromatic induction that contains no fitting parameters and is confirmed by experimental data. The theory also predicts the magnitude of chromatic induction for every possible combination of stimulus and surround demonstrating that, at least in the case of colours, the metric captures the symmetries of perception, and augments the predictive power of theories.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3