Exploring the creation or adaptation of knowledge mobilization products for culturally and linguistically diverse audiences: a scoping review

Author:

Elliott Sarah A,Scott Shannon D,Bialy Liza,Wright Kelsey,Hartling Lisa

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionConnecting end-users to research evidence has the power to improve patient knowledge and inform health decision-making. However, recognized barriers to or determinants of effective knowledge mobilization (KMb) are differences in culture and language among the end users of the evidence. This scoping review set out to understand current processes and practices when creating or adapting KMb products for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) audiences.MethodsWe searched 3 databases (Ovid Medline, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, PsychINFO) from 2011 until August 2021. We included any literature about KMb product creation or adaptation processes serving CALD communities. A primary reviewer screened all identified publications and a second reviewer screened publications excluded by the primary. Data were extracted using a standardized form by one reviewer and 10% were verified by a second reviewer. Studies were categorized by type of adaptation (‘surface’ or ‘deep’ structure) and mapped based on type of stakeholder engagement used (i2S model). A search update was run in July 2023, and screening and extraction are in progress.ResultsSeven thousand four hundred and five unique titles and abstracts were reviewed, 319 full-text studies were retrieved and reviewed, and 24 studies were included in final data extraction and mapping. Fifteen studies (63%) created or adapted exclusively text-based KMb products such as leaflets and pamphlets and 9 (38%) produced digital products such as videos (n=4, 16%), mobile applications (n=3, 13%), website (n=1, 4%) and a CD ROM (n=1, 4%). Eight studies (33%) reported following a framework or theory for their creation or adaptation efforts. Only five studies (21%) demonstrated ‘deep structure’ cultural sensitivity and applied all five (Inform, Consult, Involve, Collaborate, and Support) levels of stakeholder engagement. Four (17%) studies included reflections from the research teams on the processes for creating or adapting KMb products for CALD communities.ConclusionIncluded studies cited a variety of methods in creating or adapting KMb products for CALD communities. Successful uptake of created or adapted KMb products was often the result of collaboration with end-users for more applicable, accessible and meaningful products. Further research developing guidance and best practices is needed to support the creation or adaptation of KMb products with CALD communities.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3