Abstract
AbstractIn the Northeast Atlantic, advice for many fish stocks follows the ICES MSY approach, where a zero catch will be recommended if the stock is below its limit reference point, Blim, and cannot rebuild in the short-term. How-ever, zero catch advice are rarely implemented by managers. This study used medium-term stochastic forecasts with harvest control rules (HCRs) to investigate the consequences of allowing reduced fishing below Blim. We applied the method to western Baltic herring and North Sea cod, two contrasting species currently estimated below Blim. We show that the minimum rebuilding probability of 95% required by the MSY approach could be impossible to reach in the short-to medium-term. When this is the case, a lower probability may need to be considered instead in the short-term. Recruitment is the largest source of uncertainty in stock response to management, and can exceed differences between HCRs. Reference points should be estimated in accordance with current recruitment levels if they are to be used for short-term advice or as realistic rebuilding targets. For both stocks, it is possible to keep fishing at reduced levels for similar cumulative catch, SSB and risk on the stock in the medium-term compared to no catch below Blim. Medium-term trade-offs between stock conservation and fisheries considerations may be needed when fishery closure cannot be implemented in practice.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference70 articles.
1. Albertsen, C.M. , Trijoulet, V. , in press. Model-based estimates of reference points in an age-based state-space stock assessment model. Fisheries Research .
2. Australian Government , 2018. Guidelines for the Implementation of the Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy. Technical Report. Department of Agriculture and Water Resources.
3. Still more spawner-recruitment curves: the hockey stick and its generalizations
4. Accounting for correlated observations in an age-based state-space stock assessment model
5. When “data” are not data: the pitfalls of post hoc analyses that use stock assessment model output