Small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements for children age 6-24 months: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of effects on developmental outcomes and effect modifiers

Author:

Prado Elizabeth L.ORCID,Arnold Charles D.ORCID,Wessells K. RyanORCID,Stewart Christine P.ORCID,Abbeddou SouheilaORCID,Adu-Afarwuah SethORCID,Arnold Benjamin F.ORCID,Ashorn UllaORCID,Ashorn PerORCID,Becquey ElodieORCID,Brown Kenneth H.ORCID,Chandna Jaya,Christian ParulORCID,Dentz Holly N.,Dulience Sherlie J. L.,Fernald Lia C. H.ORCID,Galasso Emanuela,Hallamaa LottaORCID,Hess Sonja Y.ORCID,Huybregts LievenORCID,Iannotti Lora L.ORCID,Jimenez Elizabeth YakesORCID,Kohl Patricia,Lartey AnnaORCID,Port Agnes LeORCID,Luby Stephen P.ORCID,Maleta Kenneth,Matchado AndrewORCID,Matias Susana L.,Mridha Malay K.ORCID,Ntozini RobertORCID,Null ClairORCID,Ocansey Maku E.ORCID,Parvez Sarker MasudORCID,Phuka JohnORCID,Pickering Amy J.,Prendergast Andrew J.,Shamim Abu Ahmed,Siddiqui Zakia,Tofail FahmidaORCID,Weber Ann M.ORCID,Wu Lee S. F.,Dewey Kathryn G.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSmall-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) reduce child stunting and provide many of the fatty acids and micronutrients that are necessary for rapid brain development that occurs during infancy and early childhood. Positive effects of SQ-LNS on developmental outcomes have been found in some trials, but not others.ObjectivesOur objectives were to generate pooled estimates of the effect of SQ-LNS, compared to control groups that received no intervention or an intervention without any nutritional supplement, on developmental outcomes (language, social-emotional, motor, and executive function), and to identify study-level and individual-level modifiers of these effects.MethodsWe conducted a two-stage meta-analysis of individual participant data from 14 intervention versus control group comparisons in 13 randomized trials of SQ-LNS provided to infants and young children age 6 to 24 months in 9 low- or middle-income countries (total n=30,024). We generated study-specific estimates of SQ-LNS vs. control groups (including main effects and subgroup estimates for individual-level effect modifiers) and pooled the estimates using fixed-effects models. We used random effects meta-regression to examine potential study-level effect modifiers.ResultsIn 11-13 intervention versus control group comparisons (n=23,588-24,561), SQ-LNS increased mean language (mean difference: 0.07 standard deviations; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.10), social-emotional (0.08; 0.05, 0.11), and motor scores (0.08; 0.05, 0.11) and reduced the prevalence of children in the lowest decile of these scores by 17% (prevalence ratio: 0.83, 95% CI 0.76, 0.91), 19% (0.81; 0.74, 0.90), and 16% (0.84; 0.77, 0.92), respectively. SQ-LNS also increased the prevalence of children walking without support at 12 months by 9% (1.09; 1.05, 1.14). Effects of SQ-LNS on language, social-emotional, and motor outcomes were larger among study populations with a higher burden (≥ 35%) of child stunting at 18 months (mean difference 0.11-0.13 SD; 8-9 comparisons) than in populations with lower stunting burden (estimates near zero). At the individual level, greater effects of SQ-LNS were found on language among children who were acutely malnourished (mean difference: 0.31) at baseline; on language (0.12), motor (0.11), and executive function (0.06) among children in households with lower socio-economic status; and on motor development among later-born children (0.11), children of older mothers (0.10), and children of mothers with lower education (0.11).ConclusionsSQ-LNS provided daily to children in the range of 6-24 months of age can be expected to result in modest, but potentially important, developmental gains, particularly in populations with high child stunting burden. Certain groups of children who experience higher risk environments, such as those from poor households or with poor baseline nutritional status, have greater potential to benefit from SQ-LNS in developmental outcomes. This study was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO as CRD42020159971.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3