Abstract
AbstractTick Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV) is an important human arthropod-borne virus, which causes tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), an acute viral infection of the central nervous system (CNS) that causes neurological symptoms of varying severity. TBEV is prevalent in large parts of central- and northern-Europe as well as Northern Asia, and strains of varying pathogenicity have been described. Both host and viral specific characteristics have been postulated to determine the outcome of TBEV infection, but the exact basis of their clinical variability remains undefined.Here, we report the generation of Spinach RNA aptamer labelled TBEV replicons of high (Hypr) and low (Vs) pathogenicity isolates and perform the first direct comparison of both strains in cell culture. We show that pathogenic Hypr replicates to higher levels than Vs in mammalian cells, but not in arthropod cells, and that the basis of this difference maps to the NS5 region, encoding the methyltransferase and RNA polymerase. For both Hypr and Vs strains, NS5 and the viral genome localized to defined intracellular structures typical of positive strand RNA viruses, but Hypr was associated with significant activation of IRF-3, caspase-3 and caspase-8, whilst Vs activated Akt, affording protection against caspase-mediated apoptosis. Activation of TIAR and the formation of cytoplasmic stress granules were an additional early feature of Vs but not Hypr replication. Taken together, these findings highlight NS5 and novel host cell responses as key underling factors for the differential clinical characteristics of TBEV strains.ImportanceTick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is an emerging virus of the flavivirus family spread by ticks. Tick bite can transfer the virus and lead to a febrile infection, Tick-borne encephalitis, of varying severity. There is no specific therapeutic treatment and control in endemic areas is by vaccination. The basis of the different pathologies shown following TBEV infection, from mild to fatal, is not clear although the virus genotype clearly has a role. Mapping the basis of their differential effects would allow focus on the stages of the replication cycle responsible, which might guide the development of therapeutic interventions or the creation of purposefully attenuated strains as candidate vaccines.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference54 articles.
1. Tick-borne encephalitis in Sweden in relation to aseptic meningo-encephalitis of other etiology: a prospective study of clinical course and outcome
2. The clinical and epidemiological profile of tick-borne encephalitis in southern Germany 1994–98
3. Non-Hemagglutinating Flaviviruses: Molecular Mechanisms for the Emergence of New Strains via Adaptation to European Ticks
4. Deviatkin AA , Kholodilov IS , Vakulenko YA , Karganova GG , Lukashev AN. 2020. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus: An Emerging Ancient Zoonosis? Viruses 12.
5. Kreusch TM , Holding M , Hewson R , Harder T , Medlock JM , Hansford KM , Dowall S , Semper A , Brooks T , Walsh A , Russell K , Wichmann O. 2019. A probable case of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) acquired in England, July 2019. Euro Surveill 24.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献