Abstract
ABSTRACTProper ocular lens function requires lens biomechanical flexibility which is lost in presbyopia during aging. As increasing lens size has been shown previously to correlate with lens biomechanical stiffness in aging, we tested the hypothesis that whole lens size determines gross biomechanical stiffness. We used an allometric approach to evaluate this hypothesis by comparing lenses from three rodent species (mouse, rats and guinea pigs) of varying size. While rat lenses are larger and stiffer than mouse lenses, guinea pig lenses are even larger than rat lenses but are softer than the rat lens. This indicates that lens size is not a sole determinant of lens stiffness and disproves our hypothesis. Therefore, we investigated the scaling of lens microstructural features that could potentially explain the differences in biomechanical stiffness between rat and guinea pig lenses, including lens capsule thickness, epithelial cell area, fiber cell widths, suture organization, and nuclear size. Capsule thickness, epithelial cell area, and fiber cell widths scaled with lens size (i.e., greater in guinea pig lenses than rats), indicating that sizes of these features do not correlate with the stiffness of rat lenses, while suture organization was similar between rats and guinea pigs. However, we found that the hard rat lens nucleus occupies a greater fraction of the lens than the guinea pig lens nucleus, suggesting a role for nuclear size in determining whole lens stiffness. Therefore, while many features contribute to lens biomechanical properties, the size of the lens nucleus with respect to the size of the lens could be a major determinant of lens stiffness in rats versus guinea pigs.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory