Abstract
AbstractOn January 27, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, committing the United States to various goals within his campaign’s major climate policy, the Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice. Included in this executive order is a commitment to “conserving at least 30 percent of [the United States’] lands and oceans by 2030.” This ambitious conservation target signals a promising direction for biodiversity in the United States. However, while the executive order outlines several goals for climate mitigation, the ‘30×30’ target remains vague in its objectives, actions, and implementation strategies for protecting biodiversity. Biodiversity urgently needs effective conservation action, but it remains unclear where and what this 30% target will be applied to. Achieving different climate and biodiversity objectives will require different strategies and, in combination with the associated costs of implementation, will lead to different priority areas for conservation actions. Here, we illustrate what the 30% target could look like across four objectives reflective of the ambitious goals outlined in the executive order. We compile several variations of terrestrial protected area networks guided by these different objectives and examine the trade-offs in costs, ecosystem representation, and climate mitigation potential between each. We find little congruence in priority areas across objectives, emphasizing just how crucial it will be for the Biden administration to develop clear objectives and establish appropriate performance metrics from the outset to maximize both conservation and climate outcomes in support of the 30×30 target. We discuss important considerations that must guide the administration’s conservation strategies in order to ensure meaningful conservation outcomes can be achieved over the next decade.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference35 articles.
1. Ball IR , Possingham HP , Watts ME . 2009. Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritization. Pages 185-195 in Moilanen A , Wilson KA , Possingham HP , editors. Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford University Press, New York.
2. How imperfect can land sparing be before land sharing is more favourable for wild species?
3. Assessing connectivity and the contribution of private lands to protected area networks in the United States;PLoS One,2020
4. Prevent perverse outcomes from global protected area policy;Nature Ecology and Evolution,2018
5. Effective conservation requires clear objectives and prioritizing actions, not places or species
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献