Towards an unbiased characterization of genetic polymorphism

Author:

Igolkina Anna A.,Vorbrugg Sebastian,Rabanal Fernando A.ORCID,Liu Hai-Jun,Ashkenazy Haim,Kornienko Aleksandra E.,Fitz Joffrey,Collenberg Max,Kubica Christian,Morales Almudena Mollá,Jaegle Benjamin,Wrightsman TravisORCID,Voloshin Vitaly,Llaca Victor,Nizhynska Viktoria,Reichardt Ilka,Lanz Christa,Bemm Felix,Flood Pádraic J.,Nemomissa Sileshi,Hancock Angela,Guo Ya-Long,Kersey Paul,Weigel Detlef,Nordborg Magnus

Abstract

Our view of genetic polymorphism is shaped by methods that provide a limited and reference-biased picture. Long-read sequencing technologies, which are starting to provide nearly complete genome sequences for population samples, should solve the problem—except that characterizing and making sense of non-SNP variation is difficult even with perfect sequence data. Here, we analyze 27 genomes ofArabidopsis thalianain an attempt to address these issues, and illustrate what can be learned by analyzing whole-genome polymorphism data in an unbiased manner. Estimated genome sizes range from 135 to 155 Mb, with differences almost entirely due to centromeric and rDNA repeats. The completely assembled chromosome arms comprise roughly 120 Mb in all accessions, but are full of structural variants, many of which are caused by insertions of transposable elements (TEs) and subsequent partial deletions of such insertions. Even with only 27 accessions, a pan-genome coordinate system that includes the resulting variation ends up being 40% larger than the size of any one genome. Our analysis reveals an incompletely annotated mobile-ome: our ability to predict what is actually moving is poor, and we detect several novel TE families. In contrast to this, the genic portion, or “gene-ome”, is highly conserved. By annotating each genome using accession-specific transcriptome data, we find that 13% of all genes are segregating in our 27 accessions, but that most of these are transcriptionally silenced. Finally, we show that with short-read data we previously massively underestimated genetic variation of all kinds, including SNPs—mostly in regions where short reads could not be mapped reliably, but also where reads were mapped incorrectly. We demonstrate that SNP-calling errors can be biased by the choice of reference genome, and that RNA-seq and BS-seq results can be strongly affected by mapping reads to a reference genome rather than to the genome of the assayed individual. In conclusion, while whole-genome polymorphism data pose tremendous analytical challenges, they will ultimately revolutionize our understanding of genome evolution.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3