Concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, and normative properties of the Ignite app: a cognitive assessment for frontotemporal dementia

Author:

Convery Rhian S.ORCID,Adams-Carr Kerala,Nicholas Jennifer M.,Moore Katrina M.,Goldsmith Sophie,Bocchetta Martina,Russell Lucy L.,Rohrer Jonathan D.

Abstract

AbstractDigital biomarkers can provide frequent, real-time monitoring of health-related behaviour and could play an important role in the assessment of cognition in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). However, the validity and reliability of digital biomarkers as measures of cognitive function must first be determined. The Ignite computerised cognitive app contains several iPad-based measures of executive function, social cognition, and other domains known to be affected in FTD. Here we describe the normative properties of the Ignite tests, evaluate the associations with gold-standard neuropsychology tests, and investigate test-retest reliability through two healthy controls studies. Over 2,000 cognitively normal adults aged 20-80 years (mean=55.2, standard deviation=15.8) were recruited to complete the Ignite app through a remote data collection study. Significant associations were found between age and performance on several Ignite measures of processing speed (r=0.42 to 0.56,p<0.001) and executive function (r=0.43 to 0.62,p<0.001), suggesting the tests are sensitive to cognitive decline observed in normal ageing. A separate cohort of 98 healthy controls were recruited to an observational study (mean age=51.2 years, standard deviation=17.3), completing Ignite at two timepoints (7 days apart), a gold-standard pen and paper neuropsychology battery of corresponding tests, and a user experience questionnaire (10-items). The Ignite tests demonstrated moderate to excellent test-retest reliability (ICCs=0.54 to 0.92) and significantly correlated with their pen and paper counterparts (r=0.25 to 0.72,p<0.05). The majority of participants (>90%) also rated the app favourably, stating it was enjoyable and easy to complete unsupervised. These findings suggest the Ignite tests are valid measures of cognitive processes, capture a stable picture of performance over time and are well accepted in healthy controls, speaking to the feasibility of administering the app remotely. Therefore, the results have important implications for the utility of Ignite as a cognitive endpoint in upcoming FTD clinical trials.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference59 articles.

1. The heritability and genetics of frontotemporal lobar degeneration;Neurology [Internet,2009

2. The epidemiology of frontotemporal dementia

3. Therapy and clinical trials in frontotemporal dementia: past, present, and future;J Neurochem [Internet,2016

4. Staffaroni AM , Quintana M , Wendelberger B , Heuer HW , Russell LL , Cobigo Y , et al. Temporal order of clinical and biomarker changes in familial frontotemporal dementia. Nature Medicine 2022 28:10 [Internet]. 2022 Sep 22 [cited 2023 Jan 11];28(10):2194–206. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-01942-9

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3