Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThere is a paucity of disaggregated data to monitor cancer health inequalities in Canada. We used data linkage to estimate site-specific cancer relative survival by race, immigration status, household income, and education level in Canada.MethodsWe pooled the Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohorts, which are linked datasets of 5.9 million respondents of the 2006 long-form census and 6.5 million respondents of the 2011 National Household Survey. Individual-level respondent data from these surveys were probabilistically linked with the Canadian Cancer Registry up to 2015 and with the Canadian Vital Statistics Database up to 2019. We used propensity score matching and Poisson models to calculate age-standardized relative survival by equity stratifiers for all cancers combined and for 22 individual cancer sites for the period 2006-2019.ResultsThere were 757,485 primary cancer cases diagnosed over follow-up included in survival analyses; the age-standardized period relative survival was 72.5% at 5 years post-diagnosis. Relative survival was higher in immigrants (74.6%, 95%CI 74.3-74.8) than in Canadian-born persons (70.4%, 95%CI 70.2-70.6), and higher in racial groups with high proportions of immigrants. There was a marked social gradient by household income and education level, with 11-12% lower relative survival in cancer patients in the lowest household income and education levels than in the highest levels. Socioeconomic gradients were observed for most cancer sites, though the magnitude varied.ConclusionsDespite the availability of universal healthcare in Canada, the observed differences in relative survival suggest there remain important inequities in cancer control and care.