Evaluating Impacts of Syntenic Block Detection Strategies on Rearrangement Phylogeny Using M. tuberculosis Isolates

Author:

Elghraoui AfifORCID,Mirarab SiavashORCID,Swenson Krister M.ORCID,Valafar FaramarzORCID

Abstract

AbstractPhylogenetic inference based on genomic structural variations, that manipulate the gene order and content of whole chromosomes, promises to inform a more comprehensive understanding of evolution. The first challenge in using such data, the incompleteness of availablede novoassemblies, is easing as long read technologies enable (near-)complete genome assembly, but methodological challenges remain. To obtain the input to rearrangement-based inference methods, we need to detect syntenic blocks of orthologous sequences, a task that can be accomplished in many ways, none of which are obviously preferable. In this paper, we use 94 reference quality genomes of primarilyMycobacterium tuberculosis(Mtb) isolates as a benchmark to evaluate these methods. The clonal nature of Mtb evolution, the manageable genome sizes, along with substantial levels of structural variation make this an ideal benchmarking dataset. We test several methods for detecting homology and obtaining syntenic blocks, and two methods for inferring phylogenies, comparing them to the standard method that uses substitutions for inferring the tree. We find that not only the choice of methods but also their parameters can impact results, especially among branches with lower support. In particular, a method based on an encoding of adjacencies applied to Cactus-defined blocks was fully compatible with the highly supported branches of the substitution-based tree. Thus, we were able tocombinethe two trees to obtain a supertree with high resolution utilizing both SNPs and rearrangements. Furthermore, we observed that the results were much less affected by the choice of the tree inference method than by the method used to determine the underlying syntenic blocks. Overall, our results indicate that accurate trees can be inferred using genome rearrangements, but the choice of the methods for inferring the homology matters and requires care.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3