The Role of Genetic Testing in Diagnosis and Care of Inherited Cardiac Conditions in a Specialised Multidisciplinary Clinic

Author:

Stafford Fergus,Krishnan Neesha,Richardson Ebony,Butters Alexandra,Hespe Sophie,Burns Charlotte,Gray Belinda,Medi Caroline,Nowak Natalie,Isbister Julia C,Raju Hariharan,Richmond David,Ryan Mark P,Singer Emma S,Sy Raymond W,Yeates Laura,Bagnall Richard D,Semsarian Christopher,Ingles JodieORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe diagnostic yield of genetic testing for inherited cardiac diseases is up to 40% and primarily indicated for screening of at-risk relatives. Here we evaluate the role of genomics in diagnosis and management among consecutive individuals attending a specialised clinic and identify those with highest likelihood of having a monogenic disease.MethodsRetrospective audit of 1697 consecutive, unrelated probands referred to a specialised, multidisciplinary clinic between 2002 and 2020. A concordant clinical and genetic diagnosis was considered solved. Cases were classified as likely monogenic based on a score comprising a positive family history, young age at onset and severe phenotype, whereas low scoring cases were considered to have a likely complex aetiology. The impact of a genetic diagnosis was evaluated.ResultsA total of 888 probands fulfilled inclusion criteria, and genetic testing identified likely pathogenic or pathogenic (LP/P) variants in 330 individuals (37%), and suspicious variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in 73 (8%). Research-focused efforts identified 46 (5%) variants, missed by conventional genetic testing. Where a variant was identified, this changed or clarified the final diagnosis in a clinically useful way for 51 (13%). The yield of suspicious VUS across ancestry groups ranged from 15-20%, compared to only 10% among Europeans. Even when the clinical diagnosis was uncertain, those with the most monogenic disease features had the greatest diagnostic yield from genetic testing.ConclusionResearch-focused efforts can increase the diagnostic yield by up to 5%. Where a variant is identified, this will have clinical utility beyond family screening in 13%. We demonstrate the value of genomics in reaching an overall diagnosis, and highlight inequities based on ancestry. Acknowledging our incomplete understanding of disease phenotypes, we propose a framework for prioritising likely monogenic cases to solve their underlying cause of disease.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Need for Inclusive Genomic Research;Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine;2022-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3