Characteristics and healthcare use of patients attending virtual walk-in clinics: a cross-sectional analysis

Author:

Lapointe-Shaw LaurenORCID,Salahub ChristineORCID,Bhatia R. SachaORCID,Desveaux Laura,Glazier Richard H.ORCID,Hedden LindsayORCID,Ivers Noah M.ORCID,Martin DanielleORCID,Spithoff SherylORCID,Na Yingbo,Tadrous MinaORCID,Kiran Tara

Abstract

ABSTRACTImportanceVirtual walk-in clinics have proliferated since the onset of COVID-19. Yet, little is known about those who participate in this care model, and how virtual walk-in clinics contribute to care continuity and patient healthcare utilization.ObjectivesTo describe the characteristics and healthcare use of patients using virtual walk-in clinics compared to the general population, and a subset that received any virtual family physician visit.DesignThis was a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional study.SettingOntario, Canada’s most populous province.ParticipantsPatients who had received at least one family physician visit at one of 13 virtual walk-in clinics from April 1st to December 31st, 2020. They were compared to Ontario residents who had any virtual family physician visit in the same time period.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Patient characteristics and 30-day post-visit healthcare utilization.ResultsVirtual walk-in patients (N=132,168) had fewer comorbidities and lower previous healthcare utilization than Ontarians with any virtual visit. Less than 0.1% of virtual walk-in visits were with a patient’s own family physician. Compared to Ontarians having any virtual family physician visit, virtual walk-in patients were significantly less likely to have a subsequent in-person visit with the same physician (0.2% vs. 11.0%, SMD = 0.48), more likely to have a subsequent virtual visit (30.3% vs. 21.9%, SMD = 0.19), and twice as likely to have an emergency department visit within 30 days (8.3% vs. 4.1%, SMD = 0.18), an effect that persisted after adjustment and across rurality groups: large urban (aOR 2.26; 95% CI 2.08-2.45), small urban (aOR 2.08; 95% CI 1.99-2.18), and rural (aOR 1.87; 95% CI 1.69-2.07).Conclusions and RelevanceCompared to Ontarians attending any family physician virtual visit, virtual walk-in patients were less likely to have a subsequent in-person physician visit, but were more likely to visit the emergency department. Low continuity and the lack of physical examination may be contributing to increased emergency department utilization for virtual walk-in clinic patients.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3