Abstract
AbstractDirect application of pig slurry to agricultural land, as a means of nutrient recycling, introduces pathogens, antibiotic resistant bacteria, or genes, to the environment. With global environmental sustainability policies mandating a reduction in synthetic fertilisation and a commitment to a circular economy it is imperative to find effective on-farm treatments of slurry that maximises its fertilisation value and minimises risk to health and the environment. We assessed and compared the effect of storage, composting, and anaerobic digestion on pig slurry microbiome, resistome and nutrient content. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing and HT-qPCR arrays were implemented to understand the dynamics across the treatments. Our results identified that each of the treatment methods had advantages and disadvantages, depending on the parameter measured. The data suggests that storage and composting are optimal for the removal of human pathogens and anaerobic digestion for the reduction in AMR genes and mobile genetic elements. The nitrogen content is increased in storage and AD and reduced in composting. Thus, depending on the requirement for increased or reduced nitrogen the optimum treatment varies. Combining the results indicates that composting provides the greatest gain by reducing risk to human health and the environment. Network analysis revealed reducing Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes while increasing Firmicutes will reduce the AMR content. KEGG analysis identified no significant change in the pathways across all treatments. This novel study provides a data driven decision tree to determine the optimal treatment for best practice to minimise pathogen, AMR and excess or increasing nutrient transfer from slurry to environment.Graphical abstract
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference82 articles.
1. APHA, 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, D.C.
2. Effects of biochar amendment on bacterial and fungal diversity for co-composting of gelatin industry sludge mixed with organic fraction of municipal solid waste;Bioresource Technology, Special Issue on Biochar: Production, Characterization and Applications – Beyond Soil Applications,2017
3. Bernal, M.P. , Alburquerque, J.A. , Moral, R. , 2009. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresource Technology, OECD Workshop: Livestock Waste Treatment Systems of the Future: A Challenge to Environmental Quality, Food Safety, and Sustainability 100, 5444–5453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027
4. Turicibacter sanguinis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic, Gram-positive bacterium.
5. Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2021