The transmission-blocking effects antimalarial drugs revisited: mosquito fitness costs and sporontocidal effects of artesunate and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

Abstract

AbstractAssays used to evaluate the transmission-blocking activity of antimalarial drugs are largely focused on their potential to inhibit or reduce the infectivity of gametocytes, the blood stages of the parasite that are responsible for the onward transmission to the mosquito vector. For this purpose, the drug is administered concomitantly with the gametocyte-infected blood, and the results are evaluated as the % reduction in the number of oocysts in the mosquito midgut.We report the results of a series of experiments that explore the transmission blocking potential of two key antimalarial drugs, artesunate (AS) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), when administered to mosquitoes already infected from a previous blood meal. For this purpose, uninfected mosquitoes and mosquitoes carrying a 6-day old Plasmodium relictum infection (early oocyst stages) are allowed to feed either on a drug-treated or an untreated host in a fully factorial experiment. This protocol allows us to bypass the gametocyte stages and establish whether the drugs are able to arrest the ongoing development of oocysts and sporozoites, as would be the case when a mosquito takes a post-infection treated blood meal. In a separate experiment, we also explore whether a drug-treated blood meal impacts key life history traits of the mosquito relevant for transmission, and if this depends on their infection status.Our results show that feeding on an AS- or SP-treated host has no epidemiologically relevant effects on the fitness of infected or uninfected mosquitoes. In contrast, when infected mosquitoes feed on an SP-treated host, we observe both a significant increase in the number of oocysts in the midgut, and a drastic decrease in both sporozoite prevalence (−30%) and burden (−80%) compared to the untreated controls. We discuss the potential mechanisms underlying these seemingly contradictory results and contend that, provided the results are translatable to human malaria, the potential epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of the current preventive use of SP in malaria-endemic countries could be substantial.