When effort matters: Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation

Abstract

AbstractThe amount of mental effort we invest in a task is influenced by the reward we can expect if we perform that task well. However, some of the rewards that have the greatest potential for driving these efforts (e.g., jobs, grants) are partly determined by factors beyond one’s control. In such cases, effort has more limited efficacy for obtaining rewards. We have proposed that people integrate information about the expected reward and efficacy for effort to determine the expected value of control, and then adjust their control allocation (i.e. mental effort) accordingly. Here we test this theory’s key behavioral and neural predictions. We show that participants invest more control when this control is more rewarding and more efficacious, and that these incentive components separately modulate EEG signatures of incentive evaluation and proactive control allocation. Our findings support the prediction that people combine worth and worthwhileness to determine how much effort to invest.