Author:
Fong Carol Ho-Yan,Cai Jian-Piao,Dissanayake Thrimendra Kaushika,Chen Lin-Lei,Choi Charlotte Yee-Ki,Wong Lok-Hin,Ng Anthony Chin-Ki,Pang Polly K.P.,Ho Deborah Tip-Yin,Poon Rosana Wing-Shan,Chung Tom Wai-Hin,Sridhar Siddharth,Chan Kwok-Hung,Chan Jasper Fuk-Woo,Hung Ivan Fan-Ngai,Yuen Kwok-Yung,To Kelvin Kai-Wang
Abstract
ABSTRACTObjectiveCurrently available COVID-19 antibody tests using enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or immunochromatographic assay have variable sensitivity and specificity. Here, we developed and evaluated a novel microsphere-based antibody assay (MBA) for the detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) against SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (NP) and spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD).MethodWe developed a microsphere-based assay (MBA) to determine the levels of IgG against SARS-CoV-2 NP and spike RBD. The seropositive cut-off mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) was set using a cohort of 294 anonymous serum specimens collected in 2018. The specificity was assessed using serum specimens collected from organ donors or influenza patients before 2020. Seropositive rate was determined among patients with COVID-19. Time-to-seropositivity and signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratio were compared between MBA and EIA.ResultsMBA had a specificity of 100% (93/93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 96-100%) for anti-NP IgG and 98.9% (92/93; 95% CI 94.2-100%) for anti-RBD IgG. The MBA seropositive rate for convalescent serum specimens of COVID-19 patients were 89.8% (35/39) for anti-NP IgG and 79.5% (31/39) for anti-RBD IgG. The time-to-seropositivity was shorter with MBA than that of EIA. When compared with EIA, MBA could better differentiate between COVID-19 patients and negative controls with significantly higher S/CO ratio for COVID-19 patients and lower S/CO ratio with negative controls. MBA also had fewer specimens in the equivocal range (S/CO 0.9-1.1) than EIA.ConclusionMBA is robust and simple, and is suitable for clinical microbiology laboratory for the accurate determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody for retrospective diagnosis, serosurveillance, and vaccine trials.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference24 articles.
1. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome
2. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus as an Agent of Emerging and Reemerging Infection
3. Chan JF , Yuan S , Kok KH , et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020.
4. To KK , Tsang OT , Chik-Yan Yip C , et al. Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva. Clin Infect Dis. 2020.
5. To, KK . Cheng, VCC . Cai, JP . Chan, KH . Chen, LL . Wong, LH . Choi CYK . Fong, CHY . Ng, ACK . Lu, L . Luo, CT . Situ, J . Chung, TWH . Wong, SC . Kwan, G SW . Sridhara, S . Chan, JFW . Fan, CYM . Chuang, VWM . Kok, KH . Hung, IFN . Yuen, KY . Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and our returnees evacuated from Hubei province of China: a multi-cohort study The Lancet Microbe 2020;Accepted and in Press
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献