Verification of two Alternative Do-it-yourself Equipment Respirators Seal as COVID-19 Protection (VADERS-CoV): a quality assessment pilot study

Author:

Pettinger MarcoORCID,Momeni Mona,Michaud Clemence,Van Dyck Michel,Kahn David,Lemaire Guillaume

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDuring the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers are facing shortage in personal protective equipment, especially adequate respirators. Alternative do-it-yourself respirators (ADR) emerge, without any proof of protection.ObjectiveVerify seal potential of two ADR compared to a common FFP2 respirator.DesignQuality assessment pilot study.SettingTertiary Care Hospital.ParticipantsTen anaesthesiology residents.InterventionsParticipants performed quantitative face-fit tests (QNFT) with three respirators to evaluate seal. A common FFP2 respirator was used as baseline (control group). ADR tested in this study are an Anaesthesia Face Mask (AFM) and a full-face Modified Snorkelling Mask (MSM) with a 3D-printed connector, both in conjunction with a breathing system filter.Main outcome measuresNon-inferior seal performance of ADR over FFP2, assessed by calculated QNFT based on measured individual fit factors, as defined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.ResultsFor each respirator a total of 90 individual fit factor measurements were taken. Within the control group, seal failed in 37 (41%) measurements but only in 10 (11%) within the AFM group and in 6 (7%) within the MSM group (P < 0.001 respectively). However, when calculating the final, mean QNFT results, no statistically significant difference was found between respirators. Successful QNFT were determined for 5 out of 10 participants in the control group, for 8 in the AFM group (P = 0.25) and for 7 in the MSM group (P = 0.69).ConclusionBoth ADR do have the potential to provide non inferior seal compared to a common FFP2 respirator. While AFM respirators are easily assembled, snorkelling masks must undergo significant but feasible modifications. Our results suggest that those ADR masks might be further investigated as they seem to be viable alternatives for situations when certified respirators are not available.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04375774

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference17 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control during health care when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected: Interim guidance [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; [2020 Mar 19; cited 2020 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/infection-prevention-and-control-during-health-care-when-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-is-suspected-20200125.

2. World Health Organization. Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and considerations during severe shortages: Interim guidance [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; [2020 Apr 6; cited 2020 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/rational-use-of-personal-protective-equipment-for-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-and-considerations-during-severe-shortages.

3. Chini M . Coronavirus: 3 million mouth masks don’t meet quality standards. The Brussels Times [Internet]. 2020 Apr 9 [cited 2020 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.brusselstimes.com/all-news/belgium-all-news/105704/coronavirus-3-million-mouth-masks-dont-meet-quality-standards/.

4. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Counterfeit Respirators / Misrepresentation of NIOSH-Approval [Internet]. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; [updated 2020 Apr 28; Cited 2020 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/usernotices/counterfeitResp.html.

5. European Committee for Standardization. EN 149:2009–08+AC:2019. _Respiratory protective devices - Filtering half masks to protect against particles - Requirements, testing, marking_. Brussels: CEN; 2009.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3