Abstract
AbstractSynthetic lethal interactions are of paramount importance both in biology and in medicine, and hence increasing efforts have been devoted to their systematic identification. Our previous computational analysis revealed that in prokaryotic species, synthetic lethal genes tend to be further away in chromosomes than random (i.e. repulsion), which was shown to provide bacterial genomes with greater robustness to large-scale DNA deletions. To test the generalizability of this observation in eukaryotic genomes, we leveraged the wealth of experimentally determined synthetic lethal genetic interactions of yeast that are curated in the BioGRID (Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets) database. We observed an opposite trend that is the genomic proximity of synthetic lethal gene pairs both on the 2D and 3D chromosomal space of the yeast genome (i.e. 2D and 3D attraction). To gain mechanistic insights into the origin of the attraction of synthetic lethal gene pairs in S. cerevisiae, we characterized four classes of genes, in which synthetic lethal interactions are enriched and partly explain the observed patterns of genomic attraction: i) gene pairs operating on the same pathways, 2) co-expressed genes, 3) gene pairs whose protein products physically interact and 4) the paralogs. However, our analysis revealed that the contribution of these four types of genes is not sufficient to fully explain the observed 2D and 3D attraction of synthetic lethal gene pairs and hence its evolutionary origin still remains as an open question.Significance statementUnravelling the organizing principles underlying gene arrangements is one of the fundamental questions of research in evolutionary biology. One understudied aspect of this organization is the relative chromosomal arrangement of synthetic lethal gene pairs. In this study, by analyzing a wealth of synthetic lethality data in yeast, we provide evidence that synthetic lethal gene pairs tend to be attracted to each other both on 2D and 3D chromosomal space of the yeast genome. This observation is in sharp contrast with the repulsion of synthetic lethal (metabolic) gene pairs that we observed previously in bacterial genomes. Characterizing the evolutionary forces underlying this genomic pattern in yeast can open the door towards an evolutionary theory of genome organization in eukaryotes.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory