Author:
Hu Leland S.,Wang Lujia,Hawkins-Daarud Andrea,Eschbacher Jennifer M.,Singleton Kyle W.,Jackson Pamela R.,Clark-Swanson Kamala,Sereduk Christopher P.,Peng Sen,Wang Panwen,Wang Junwen,Baxter Leslie C.,Smith Kris A.,Mazza Gina L.,Stokes Ashley M.,Bendok Bernard R.,Zimmerman Richard S.,Krishna Chandan,Porter Alyx B.,Mrugala Maciej M.,Hoxworth Joseph M.,Wu Teresa,Tran Nhan L.,Swanson Kristin R.,Li Jing
Abstract
ABSTRACTBACKGROUNDRadiogenomics uses machine-learning (ML) to directly connect the morphologic and physiological appearance of tumors on clinical imaging with underlying genomic features. Despite extensive growth in the area of radiogenomics across many cancers, and its potential role in advancing clinical decision making, no published studies have directly addressed uncertainty in these model predictions.METHODSWe developed a radiogenomics ML model to quantify uncertainty using transductive Gaussian Processes (GP) and a unique dataset of 95 image-localized biopsies with spatially matched MRI from 25 untreated Glioblastoma (GBM) patients. The model generated predictions for regional EGFR amplification status (a common and important target in GBM) to resolve the intratumoral genetic heterogeneity across each individual tumor - a key factor for future personalized therapeutic paradigms. The model used probability distributions for each sample prediction to quantify uncertainty, and used transductive learning to reduce the overall uncertainty. We compared predictive accuracy and uncertainty of the transductive learning GP model against a standard GP model using leave-one-patient-out cross validation.RESULTSPredictive uncertainty informed the likelihood of achieving an accurate sample prediction. When stratifying predictions based on uncertainty, we observed substantially higher performance in the group cohort (75% accuracy, n=95) and amongst sample predictions with the lowest uncertainty (83% accuracy, n=72) compared to predictions with higher uncertainty (48% accuracy, n=23), due largely to data interpolation (rather than extrapolation).CONCLUSIONWe present a novel approach to quantify radiogenomics uncertainty to enhance model performance and clinical interpretability. This should help integrate more reliable radiogenomics models for improved medical decision-making.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory