Abstract
AbstractMost countries are suffering severely from the ongoing covid-19 pandemic despite various levels of preventive measures. A common question is if and when a country or region will reach herd immunity h. The classical herd immunity level hC is defined as hC =1−1/R0, where R0 is the basic reproduction number, for covid-19 estimated to lie somewhere in the range 2.2-3.5 depending on country and region. It is shown here that the disease-induced herd immunity level hD, after an outbreak has taken place in a country/region with a set of preventive measures put in place, is actually substantially smaller than hC. As an illustration we show that if R0 =2.5 in an age-structured community with mixing rates fitted to social activity studies, and also categorizing individuals into three categories: low active, average active and high active, and where preventive measures affect all mixing rates proportionally, then the disease-induced herd immunity level is hD = 43% rather than hC =1−1/2.5 = 60%. Consequently, a lower fraction infected is required for herd immunity to appear. The underlying reason is that when immunity is induced by disease spreading, the proportion infected in groups with high contact rates is greater than that in groups with low contact rates. Consequently, disease-induced immunity is stronger than when immunity is uniformly distributed in the community as in the classical herd immunity level.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference15 articles.
1. S. Flaxman , S. Mishra , A. Gandy , H. Unwin , H. Coupland , T. Mellan , H. Zhu , T. Berah , J. Eaton , P. Perez Guzman , et al., “Report 13: Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on covid-19 in 11 european countries,” 2020.
2. Public Health Institute of Sweden, “Estimates of the peak-day and the number of infected individuals during the covid-19 outbreak in the stockholm region, sweden february—april 2020,” 2020.
3. N. Ferguson , D. Laydon , G. Nedjati Gilani, N. Imai , K. Ainslie , M. Baguelin , S. Bhatia , A. Boonyasiri , Z. Cucunuba Perez , G. Cuomo-Dannenburg , et al., “Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (npis) to reduce covid19 mortality and healthcare demand,” 2020.
4. W. Bock , B. Adamik , M. Bawiec , V. Bezborodov , M. Bodych , J. P. Burgard , T. Goetz , T. Krueger , A. Migalska , B. Pabjan , et al., “Mitigation and herd immunity strategy for covid-19 is likely to fail,” medRxiv, 2020.
5. O. Diekmann , H. Heesterbeek , and T. Britton , Mathematical tools for understanding infectious disease dynamics, vol. 7. Princeton University Press, 2013.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献