Abstract
AbstractThe action/perception theory of cortical organization is supported by the finding that pantomime hand movements of reaching and grasping are different from real movements. Frame-by-frame video analysis and MATLAB®based tracking examined real/pantomime differences in a bilaterally movement, string-pulling, pulling down a rope with hand-over-hand movements. Sensory control of string-pulling varied from visually-direct when cued, visually-indirect when non cued and somatosensory controlled in the absence of vision. Cued grasping points were visual tracked and the pupils dilated in anticipation of the grasp, but when noncued, visual tracking and pupil responses were absent. In real string-pulling, grasping and releasing the string featured an arpeggio movement in which the fingers close and open in the sequence 5 through 1 (pinki first, thumb last); in pantomime, finger order was reversed, 1 through 5. In real string-pulling, the hand is fully opened and closed to grasp and release; in pantomime, hand opening was attenuated and featured a gradual opening centered on the grasp. The temporal structure of arm movements in real string-pulling featured up-arm movements that were faster than down-arm movement. In pantomime, up/down movements had similar speed. In real string-pulling, up/down arm movements were direct and symmetric; in pantomime, they were more circular and asymmetric. That pantomime string-pulling featured less motoric and temporal complexity than real string-pulling is discussed in relation to the action/perception theory and in relation to the idea that pantomimed string-pulling may feature the substitution of gestures for real movement.Significant StatementMost laboratory studies investigating hand movements made by humans feature single hand movements, the current study presents a novel string-pulling task to study bimanual coordination of left and right hands in real and pantomime conditions. The results show that pantomime string-pulling featured less motoric and temporal complexity than real string-pulling. These findings are relevant to the contemporary theory of action and perception that the dorsal stream (parietal cortex) is related to actions and the ventral stream (temporal cortex) is related to perception.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference60 articles.
1. Apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes, Pongo abelii) versus corvids (Corvus corax, C. corone) in a support task: the effect of pattern and functionality;J Comp Psychol,2012
2. Arthur D , Vassilvitskii S (2007) k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. In: Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pp 1027–1035. New Orleans, Louisiana: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
3. Blackwell A , R. Köppen J , Whishaw I , Wallace D (2017) String-pulling for food by the rat: Assessment of movement, topography and kinematics of a bilaterally skilled forelimb act. Learning and Motivation.
4. The structure of arm and hand movements in a spontaneous and food rewarded on-line string-pulling task by the mouse;Behav Brain Res,2018
5. Unilateral forelimb sensorimotor cortex devascularization disrupts the topographic and kinematic characteristics of hand movements while string-pulling for food in the rat;Behav Brain Res,2018