methylSCOPA and META-methylSCOPA: software for the analysis and aggregation of epigenome-wide association studies of multiple correlated phenotypes

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMulti-phenotype genome-wide association studies (MP-GWAS) of correlated traits have greater power to detect genotype–phenotype associations than single-trait GWAS. However, no multi-phenotype analysis method exists for epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS).ResultsWe extended the SCOPA approach developed by us to “methylSCOPA” software in C++ by ‘reversely’ regressing DNA hyper/hypo-methylation information on a linear combination of phenotypes. We evaluated two models of association between DNA methylation and fasting glucose (FG) and insulin (FI) levels: Model 1, including FG, FI, and three measured potential confounders (body mass index [BMI], fasting serum triglyceride levels [TG], and waist/hip ratio [WHR]), and Model 2, including FG and FI corrected for the effects of BMI, TG, and WHR. Both models were additionally corrected for participant sex and smoking status (current/ever/never). We meta-analyzed the cohort-specific MP-EWAS results with our novel software META-methylSCOPA, mapped genomic locations to CGCh37/hg19, and adopted P<1×10−7 to denote epigenome-wide significance. We used the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450K BeadChip array data from the Northern Finland Birth Cohorts (NFBC) 1966/1986. We quality-controlled the data, regressed out the effects of measured potential confounders, and normalized the methylation signal intensity and FI data. The MP-EWAS included data for 643/457 individuals from NFBC1966 and NFBC1986, respectively (total N=1,100).In Model 1, we detected epigenome-wide significant association in the MP-EWAS meta-analysis at cg13708645 (chr12:121,974,305; P=1.2×10−8) within KDM2B gene. Single-trait effects within KDM2B were on FI, BMI, and WHR. Model with effect on BMI and WHR showed the strongest association at this locus, while effect on FI in single-phenotype analysis was driven by the effect of adiposity. In Model 2, the strongest association was at cg05063096 (chr3:143,689,810; P=2.3×10−7) annotated to C3orf58 with strongest effect on FI in single-trait analysis and multi-phenotype effect on FI and WHI within Model 1.We characterized the effects of established EWAS loci for diabetes and its risk factors and detected suggestive (p<0.01) associations at six markers including PHGDH, TXNIP, SLC7A11, CPT1A, MYO5C and ABCG1, through the dissection of the multi-phenotype effects in Model 1.ConclusionsWe implemented MP-EWAS in methylSCOPA and demonstrated its enhanced power over single-trait EWAS for correlated phenotypes in large-scale data.