Abstract
AbstractPeripheral vision comprises most of our visual field, and is essential in guiding visual behavior. Its characteristic capabilities and limitations, which distinguish it from foveal vision, have been explained by the most influential theory of peripheral vision as the product of representing the visual input using summary-statistics. Despite its success, this account may provide a limited understanding of peripheral vision, because it neglects processes of perceptual grouping and segmentation. To test this hypothesis, we studied how contextual modulation, namely the modulation of the perception of a stimulus by its surrounds, interacts with segmentation in human peripheral vision. We used naturalistic textures, which are directly related to summary-statistics representations. We show that segmentation cues affect contextual modulation, and that this is not captured by our implementation of the summary-statistics model. We then characterize the effects of different texture statistics on contextual modulation, providing guidance for extending the model, as well as for probing neural mechanisms of peripheral vision.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference137 articles.
1. A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding
2. Asymmetry of visual interference
3. The role of central and peripheral vision in postural control duringwalking
4. Parsimonious Mixed Models,2015
5. Bates, D. , Martin Maechler , Ben Bolker , Steven Walker , Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen , Henrik Singmann , … John Fox . (2019). Lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. Retrieved April 21, 2020, from https://rdrr.io/cran/lme4/
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Dissecting (un)crowding;Journal of Vision;2021-09-13