Encoding Variability: When Pattern Reactivation Does Not Benefit Context Memory

Author:

Sievers CarolinORCID,Smith Fraser W.,Saada Janak,Simons Jon S.,Renoult Louis

Abstract

AbstractA growing body of evidence suggests that neural pattern reactivation supports successful memory formation across multiple study episodes. Previous studies investigating the beneficial effects of repeated encoding typically presented the same stimuli repeatedly under the same encoding task instructions. In contrast, repeating stimuli in different contexts is associated with superior item memory, but poorer memory for contextual features varying across repetitions. In the present functional magnetic-resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we predicted dissociable mechanisms to underlie the successful formation of context memory when the context in which stimuli are repeated is either held constant or varies at each stimulus presentation. Twenty participants studied names of famous people four times, either in the same task repeatedly, or in four different encoding tasks. This was followed by a surprise recognition memory test, including a source judgement about the encoding task. Behaviourally, different task encoding compared to same task encoding was associated with fewer correct context memory judgements but also better item memory, as reflected in fewer misses. Searchlight representational similarity analysis revealed fMRI pattern reactivation in the posterior cingulate cortex to be higher for correct compared to incorrect source memory judgements in the same task condition, with the opposite pattern being observed in the different task condition. It was concluded that higher levels of pattern reactivation in the posterior cingulate cortex index generalisation across context information, which in turn may improve item memory performance during encoding variability but at the cost of contextual features.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference61 articles.

1. ParaView: An end-user tool for large-data visualization;Visualization Handbook,2005

2. Anderson, M. C. , & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and Inhibition in Memory Retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory. Handbook of Perception and Cognition (2nd ed., pp. 237–313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012102570-0/50010-0

3. Ashburner, J. , Barnes, G. , Chen, C.-C. , Daunizeau, J. , Flandin, G. , Friston, K. J. , … Phillips, C. (2016). SPM12 Manual. Retrieved August 17, 2016, from http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/doc/manual.pdf

4. What makes distributed practice effective?

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3