Abstract
AbstractDetermining the unbinding pathways of potential small molecule compounds from their target proteins is of great significance for designing efficacious treatment solutions. One of these potential compounds is the approved HIV-1 protease inhibitor, Indinavir, which has a weak effect on the HTLV-1 protease. In this work, by employing the SuMD method, we reconstructed the unbinding pathways of Indinavir from HIV and HTLV-1 proteases to compare and understand the mechanism of the unbinding and discover the reasons for the lack of inhibitory activity against the HTLV-1 protease. We achieved multiple unbinding events from both HIV and HTLV-1 proteases. Also, we found that the mobility and fluctuations of the flap region are higher in the HTLV-1 protease, making the drug less stable. We realized that critically positioned aromatic residues such as Trp98/Trp98′ and Phe67/Phe67′ in the HTLV-1 protease could make strong π-Stacking interactions with Indinavir, which are unfavorable for the stability of Indinavir in the active site. The details found in this study can make a reasonable explanation for the lack of inhibitory activity of this drug against HTLV-1 protease. We believe the details discovered in this work can help design more effective and more selective inhibitors for the HTLV-1 protease.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference78 articles.
1. Origin of the retroviruses: when, where, and how?;Current Opinion in Virology,2017
2. Interactions between human endogenous and exogenous retroviruses;Genes & Genomics,2017
3. Endogenous Retroviruses: With Us and against Us;Frontiers in chemistry,2017
4. UNAIDS, 2019. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet.
5. HIV protease inhibitors: a review of molecular selectivity and toxicity;HIV AIDS (Auckl),2015