Tenofovir-DF versus Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: An Observational Study (TEDHICOV)

Author:

Cornejo-Giraldo MarioORCID,Rosado Nelson,Salinas Jesús,Aspilcueta Nelson,Bernales Eduardo,Lipa Jimmy,Coacalla Johanna,Flores Yoisi,Leon Pamela,Chamby Claudia

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundAlthough several therapeutic agents have been suggested for the treatment of the disease caused by the Coronavirus of the year 2019 (COVID-19), no antiviral has yet demonstrated consistent efficacy.MethodsThe results of an observational study comparing Tenofovir-DF (TDF) with Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with evidence of pulmonary compromise and the vast majority with supplemental oxygen requirement are presented. Patients received HCQ consecutively at the dose of 400 mg. 12 hourly for 01 day and then 200 mg. every 8 to 12 hours PO for 5 to10 days; or TDF 300 mg. per day PO for 7 to 10 days. The primary outcomes of the study were the differences between the two groups regarding: hospital stay, the need for intensive care or mechanical ventilation (ICU / MV) and mortality.Results104 patients were included: 36 in the HCQ group and 68 in the TDF group. The unadjusted primary outcomes were: LOS (length of stay) 16.6 ± 12.1 for HCQ versus 12.2 ± 7.0 days for TDF (p = o.o102); need for admission to ICU / mechanical ventilation (MV): 61.1% for HCQ versus 11.8% for TDF (p = o.ooo); and mortality: 50.0% for HCQ and 8.8% for TDF (p = o.ooo). The patients in the HCQ group had significant differences at admission compared to those in the TDF group regarding: male sex, cardiovascular risk factor, greater respiratory involvement and higher glucose and creatinine levels, lower albumin levels and higher. Inflammatory markers. When the outcomes were adjusted for these baseline differences, in the multiple regression model for LOS, it was found that TDF decreased the hospital stay by 6.10 days (C.I.: −11.97 to −2.40, p = o.o42); In the logistic regression model for the need for ICU / MV, it was found that the use of TDF had an O.R. of 0.15 (C.I.: 0.03-0.76, p = o.o22); and for the Cox proportional hazards model for mortality, the H.R. was 0.16 for TDF (C.I.: 0.03-0.96, p = o.o41). In the estimation model of the treatment effects by regression adjustment, it was found that TDF decreased the stay by −6.38 days (C.I.: −12.34 to −0.42, p = o.o36); the need for ICU / MV at −41.74% (C.I.: −63.72 to −19.7, p = o.ooo); and mortality by −35.22% (C.I.: −56.47 to −13.96, p = o.oo1).ConclusionTDF may be an effective antiviral in the treatment of COVID-19. Some of its advantages include: its wide availability, cost and oral presentation. Randomized clinical trials are imperatively required to confirm this possibility.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference80 articles.

1. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019

2. MINSA. Sala situacional Perú. COVID-19. 2020 [cited 2020 17/12/20]; Available from: https://covid19.minsa.gob.pe/sala_situacional.asp.

3. Arequipa, G.R.d.S.-G.R.d. Situación del COVID-19 Arequipa. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2020 17/12/20]; Available from: https://www.saludarequipa.gob.pe/epidemiologia/Covid19/COVID19.pdf.

4. Group, R.C. , et al., Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 - Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med, 2020.

5. Ahmed, M.H. and A. Hassan , Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): a Review. SN Compr Clin Med, 2020: p. 1-10.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3