Can we distinguish modes of selective interactions using linkage disequilibrium?

Author:

Ragsdale Aaron P.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractSelected mutations interfere and interact with evolutionary processes at nearby loci, distorting allele frequency trajectories and correlations between pairs of mutations. A number of recent studies have used patterns of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between selected variants to test for selective interference and epistatic interactions, with some disagreement over interpreting observations from data. Interpretation is hindered by the relative lack of analytic or even numerical expectations for patterns of variation between pairs of loci under the combined effects of selection, dominance, epistasis, and demography. Here, I develop a numerical approach to compute the expected two-locus sampling distribution under diploid selection with arbitrary epistasis and dominance, recombination, and variable population size. I use this to explore how epistasis and dominance affect expected signed LD, including for non-steady-state demography relevant to human populations. Finally, I use whole-genome sequencing data from humans to assess how well we can differentiate modes of selective interactions in practice. I find that positive LD between missense mutations within genes is driven by strong positive allele-frequency correlations between pairs of mutations that fall within the same conserved domain, pointing to compensatory mutations or antagonistic epistasis as the prevailing mode of interaction within but not outside of conserved genic elements. The heterogeneous landscape of both mutational fitness effects and selective interactions within protein-coding genes calls for more refined inferences of the joint distribution of fitness and interactive effects, and the methods presented here should prove useful in that pursuit.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3