Variation in reflectance spectroscopy of European beech leaves captures phenology and biological hierarchies despite measurement uncertainties

Author:

Petibon FannyORCID,Czyż Ewa A.ORCID,Ghielmetti GiuliaORCID,Hueni AndreasORCID,Kneubühler MathiasORCID,Schaepman Michael E.ORCID,Schuman Meredith C.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe measurement of leaf optical properties (LOP) using reflectance and scattering properties of light allows a continuous, time-resolved, and rapid characterization of many species traits including water status, chemical composition, and leaf structure. Variation in trait values expressed by individuals result from a combination of biological and environmental variations. Such species trait variations are increasingly recognized as drivers and responses of biodiversity and ecosystem properties. However, little has been done to comprehensively characterize or monitor such variation using leaf reflectance, where emphasis is more often on species average values. Furthermore, although a variety of platforms and protocols exist for the estimation of leaf reflectance, there is neither a standard method, nor a best practise of treating measurement uncertainty which has yet been collectively adopted. In this study, we investigate what level of uncertainty can be accepted when measuring leaf reflectance while ensuring the detection of species trait variation at several levels: within individuals, over time, between individuals, and between populations. As a study species, we use an economically and ecologically important dominant European tree species, namely Fagus sylvatica. We first use fabrics as standard material to quantify the measurement uncertainties associated with leaf clip (0.0001 to 0.4 reflectance units) and integrating sphere measurements (0.0001 to 0.01 reflectance units) via error propagation. We then quantify spectrally resolved variation in reflectance from F. sylvatica leaves. We show that the measurement uncertainty associated with leaf reflectance, estimated using a field spectroradiometer with attached leaf clip, represents on average a small portion of the spectral variation within a single individual sampled over time (2.7 ± 1.7%), or between individuals (1.5 ± 1.3% or 3.4 ± 1.7%, respectively) in a set of monitored F. sylvatica trees located in Swiss and French forests. In all forests, the spectral variation between individuals exceeded the spectral variation of a single individual measured within one week. However, measurements of variation within an individual at different canopy positions over time indicate that sampling design (e.g., standardized sampling, and sample size) strongly impacts our ability to measure between-individual variation. We suggest best practice approaches towards a standardized protocol to allow for rigorous quantification of species trait variation using leaf reflectance.HighlightsWe partition biological variation from measurement uncertainty for leaf spectra.Measurement uncertainty represents ca. 3% of spectral variation among beech trees.Biological variation within an individual increases by 80% as leaves mature.Maxima of uncertainty correspond to maxima of biological variation (water content).We recommend procedures to quantify biological variation in spectral measurements.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference68 articles.

1. When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology?;Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol.Syst,2011

2. Retrieval of specific leaf area from Landsat-8 surface reflectance data using statistical and physical models;IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens,2017

3. Analytical Spectral Devices Inc., 2010. FieldSpec®3 user manual.

4. Analytical Spectral Devices Inc., 2008. Integrating sphere user manual.

5. On the reproducibility of field-measured reflectance factors in the context of vegetation studies;Remote Sens. Environ,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3