The time to peak blood bicarbonate (HCO3−), pH, and strong ion difference (SID) following sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) ingestion in highly trained adolescent swimmers

Author:

Newbury Josh W.,Cole Matthew,Kelly Adam L.,Chessor Richard J.,Sparks S. AndyORCID,McNaughton Lars R.,Gough Lewis A.

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundContemporary research suggests that the optimal timing of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) should be based upon an individual time in which bicarbonate (HCO3) or pH peaks within the blood. However, the mechanisms surrounding acidosis on exercise performance are contested, therefore it is plausible that the ergogenic effects of NaHCO3 are instead a result of an increased strong ion difference (SID) following ingestion. Since the post-ingestion time course of the SID is currently unknown, the purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of the SID in direct comparison to HCO3 and pH.MethodsTwelve highly trained, adolescent swimmers (age: 15.9 ± 1.0 yrs, body mass: 65.3 ± 9.6 kg) consumed their typical pre-competition nutrition before ingesting 0.3 g·kg BM-1 NaHCO3 in gelatine capsules. Capillary blood samples were then taken during quiet, seated rest on nine occasions (0, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, 135, 150, and 165 min post-ingestion) for the assessment of time course changes in HCO3, pH, and the SID.ResultsOn a group mean level, no differences were found in the time in which each variable peaked within the blood (HCO3 = 130 ± 35 min, pH = 120 ± 38 min, SID = 96 ± 35 min; p = 0.06). A large effect size was calculated between the timing of peak HCO3 and the SID (g = 0.91), however, suggesting that a difference may occur between these two measures in practice.ConclusionsA time difference between peak HCO3 and the SID presents an interesting avenue for further research since an approach based upon individual increases in extracellular SID has yet to be investigated. Future studies should therefore compare these dosing strategies directly to elucidate whether either one is more ergogenic for exercise performance.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3