Author:
Senchyna Fiona,Gaur Rajiv,Sandlund Johanna,Truong Cynthia,Tremintin Guillaume,Küeltz Dietmar,Gomez Carlos A.,Tamburini Fiona B.,Andermann Tessa,Bhatt Ami,Tickler Isabella,Watz Nancy,Budvytiene Indre,Shi Gongyi,Tenover Fred C.,Banaei Niaz
Abstract
AbstractCarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are emerging as a major health threat in North America. The mechanism of resistance to carbapenems has therapeutic and public health implications. We comprehensively characterized the underlying mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in CRE isolates recovered between 2013 and 2016 at a health system in Northern California. Genotypic methods were used to detect carbapenemases and plasmid-encoded cephalosporinases, and mass spectrometry was used to quantify relative porin levels for OmpC and OmpF and their analogs. MICs for imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam were measured. Whole genome sequencing was used for strain typing. A carbapenemase gene encoding blaOXA-48 like, blaNDM, blaKPC, blaSME, blaIMP, and blaVIM was detected in 38.7% (24/62) of CRE isolates. Porin levels was down at least 2-fold in 91.9% (57/62) of isolates. Including carbapenemase genes and porin loss, the mechanism of resistance was identified in 95.2% (59/62) of CRE isolates. Of the carbapenemase gene-positive isolates, blaKPC -positive isolates were 100% susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam; blaOXA-48 like-positive isolates were 100% susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam; and blaSME-positive isolates were 100% susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. 100% (38/38), 92.1% (35/38), 89.5% (34/38), and 31.6% (12/38) of carbapenemase gene-negative CRE isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, respectively. None of the CRE strains were genetically identical. In conclusion, at this health system in Silicon Valley, carbapenemase-producing CRE occurred sporadically and were mediated by diverse mechanisms. Nucleic acid testing for blaOXA-48 like, blaNDM, blaKPC, blaIMP, and blaVIM was sufficient to distinguish between carbapenemase-producing and non-producing CRE and accurately predicted susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and imipenem-relebactam.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献