Performance of Open-Source LLMs in Challenging Radiological Cases – A Benchmark Study on 4,049 Eurorad Case Reports

Author:

Kim Su HwanORCID,Schramm Severin,Adams Lisa C.,Braren Rickmer,Bressem Keno K.,Keicher Matthias,Zimmer Claus,Hedderich Dennis M.,Wiestler Benedikt

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundRecent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have created new ways to support radiological diagnostics. While both open-source and proprietary LLMs can address privacy concerns through local or cloud deployment, open-source models provide advantages in continuity of access, independence from commercial update cycles, and potentially lower costs.PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of open-source LLMs on challenging radiological cases across multiple subspecialties.MethodsWe evaluated the diagnostic performance of eleven state-of-the-art open-source LLMs using clinical and imaging descriptions from 4,049 case reports in the Eurorad library. Cases spanned all radiological subspecialties and excluded those with explicit mentioning of the correct diagnoses in the case description. LLMs provided differential diagnoses based on clinical history and imaging findings. Responses were considered correct if the true diagnosis was included in the top three LLM suggestions. Llama-3-70B evaluated LLM responses, with its accuracy validated against radiologist ratings in a case subset (n = 140). Confidence intervals were adjusted based on this validation. Models were further tested on 60 non-public brain MRI cases from a tertiary hospital to assess generalizability.ResultsLlama-3-70B demonstrated superior performance (75.1 ± 1.7% correct), followed by Gemma-2-27B (63.9 ± 1.8%) and Mixtral-8x-7B (61.5 ± 1.8%). Performance varied across subspecialties, with highest accuracy across models in genital (female) imaging (59.7 ± 2.7%) and lowest in musculoskeletal imaging (47.1 ± 1.5%). Llama-3-70B’s judging accuracy was 87.8% (123/140; 95% CI: 0.82 – 0.93) compared to radiologists. Similar performance results were found in the non-public dataset, where Llama-3-70B (71.7 ± 14.1%), Gemma-2-27B (53.3 ± 15.1%), and Mixtral-8x-7B (51.7 ± 15.1%) again emerged as the top models.ConclusionSeveral open-source LLMs showed promising performance in identifying the correct diagnosis based on case descriptions from the Eurorad library, highlighting their potential as decision support tools for radiological differential diagnosis in challenging, real-world cases.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3