Evaluating Physiological Indicators in Detecting Deception using the Comparison Question Test (CQT)

Abstract

AbstractDespite significant advancements in deception detection, traditional methods often fall short in real-world applications. This study addresses these limitations by evaluating the effectiveness of various physiological measures— Pupil Response, Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Heart Rate (HR), and facial temperature changes— in predicting deception using the Comparison Question Test (CQT). It also fills a critical research gap by validating these methods within an Asian context. Employing a between-subjects design, data was collected from a diverse sample of 118 participants from Singapore, including Chinese, Indian, and Malay individuals. The research aims to identify which physiological indicators, in combination, offer the most robust predictions of deceptive behavior. Key innovations include the adaptation of the CQT with a modified directed lie paradigm and an expanded sample size to assess the relative importance of each physiological measure. The study’s findings reveal that Pupil Response is the most significant predictor of deception, with EDA enhancing the model’s explanatory power. HR, while relevant, adds limited value when combined with Pupil Response and EDA, and facial temperature changes were statistically non-significant. The study highlights the need for further research into the interactions among physiological measures and their application in varied contexts. This research contributes valuable insights into improving deception detection methodologies and sets the stage for future investigations that could incorporate additional physiological indicators and explore real-world applications.