Receiving information on machine learning-based clinical decision support systems in psychiatric services increases staff trust in these systems: A randomized survey experiment

Author:

Perfalk ErikORCID,Bernstorff MartinORCID,Danielsen Andreas AalkjærORCID,Østergaard Søren DinesenORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundClinical decision support systems based on machine learning (ML) models are emerging within psychiatry. To ensure their successful implementation, healthcare staff needs to trust these systems. Here, we investigated if providing staff with basic information about ML-based clinical decision support systems enhances their trust in them.MethodsWe conducted a randomised survey experiment among staff in the Psychiatric Services of the Central Denmark Region. The participants were allocated to one of three arms, receiving different types of information: An intervention arm (receiving information on clinical decision-making supported by an ML model); an active control arm (receiving information on standard clinical decision process without ML support); and a blank control arm (no information). Subsequently, participants responded to various questions regarding their trust/distrust in ML-based clinical decision support systems. The effect of the intervention was assessed by pairwise comparisons between all randomization arms on sum scores of trust and distrust.FindingsAmong 2,838 invitees, 780 completed the survey experiment. The intervention enhanced trust and diminished distrust in ML-based clinical decision support systems compared with the active control arm (Trust: mean difference= 5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2%; 9%], p-value < 0.001; Distrust: mean difference=-4% [-7%; -1%], p-value = 0.042)) and the blank control arm (Trust: mean difference= 5% [2%; 11%], p-value = 0.003; Distrust: mean difference= -3% [-6%; - 1%], p-value = 0.021).InterpretationProviding information on ML-based clinical decision support systems in hospital psychiatry may increase healthcare staff trust in such systems.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3