Author:
Lin Shanlang,Huang Junpei,He Ziwen,Zhan Dandan
Abstract
AbstractVarious epidemic prevention and control measures aimed at reducing person-to-person contact has paid a certain cost while controlling the epidemic. So accurate evaluation of these measures helps to maximize the effectiveness of prevention and control while minimizing social costs. In this paper, we develop the model in Dirk Brockmann and Dirk Helbing (2013) to theoretically explain the impact mechanism of traffic control and social distancing measures on the spread of the epidemic, and empirically tests the effect of the two measures in China at the present stage using econometric approach. We found that both traffic control and social distancing measures have played a very good role in controlling the development of the epidemic. Nationally, social distancing measures are better than traffic control measures; the two measures are complementary and their combined action will play a better epidemic prevention effect; Traffic control and social distancing do not work everywhere. Traffic control only works in cities with higher GDP per capita and population size, while fails in cities with lower GDP per capita and population size. In cities with lower population size, social distancing becomes inoperative; the rapid and accurate transmission of information, a higher protection awareness of the public, and a stronger confidence of residents in epidemic prevention can promote the realization of the measure effects. The findings above verify the effectiveness and correctness of the measures implemented in China at present, at the same time, we propose that it is necessary to fully consider the respective characteristics of the two measures, cooperating and complementing each other; what’s more, measures should be formulated according to the city’s own situation, achieving precise epidemic prevention; Finally, we should increase the transparency of information, improve protection awareness of the public, guide emotions of the public in a proper way, enhancing public confidence.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference48 articles.
1. Anderson, R. M. , Anderson, B. , & May, R. M. (1992). Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control. Oxford university press.
2. Is There a Case for Quarantine? Perspectives from SARS to Ebola
3. The Hidden Geometry of Complex, Network-Driven Contagion Phenomena
4. Public health and ethical considerations in planning for quarantine;The Yale journal of biology and medicine,2005
5. Cetron, M. , Maloney, S. , Koppaka, R. , & Simone, P. (2004). Isolation and quarantine: Containment strategies for SARS 2003. Learning from SARS: Preparing for the Next Disease Outbreak, 71–83.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献