Abstract
AbstractHumans are sexually dimorphic: men and women differ in body build and composition, craniofacial structure, and voice pitch, likely mediated in part by developmental testosterone. Sexual selection hypotheses posit that, ancestrally, more ‘masculine’ men may have acquired more mates and/or sired more viable offspring. Thus far, however, evidence for either association is unclear. Here, we meta-analyze the relationships between six masculine traits and mating/reproductive outcomes (96 studies, 474 effects, N = 177,044). Voice pitch, height, and testosterone all predicted mating; however, strength/muscularity was the strongest and only consistent predictor of both mating and reproduction. Facial masculinity and digit ratios did not significantly predict either. There was no clear evidence for any effects of masculinity on offspring viability. Our findings support arguments that strength/muscularity can be considered sexually selected in humans, but raise concerns over other forms of masculinity and highlight the need to increase tests of evolutionary hypotheses outside of industrialized populations.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference176 articles.
1. Sexual dimorphism in primate evolution
2. J. H. Crook , “Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organization in the primates” in Sexual selection and the descent of man, B. G. Campbell , Ed. (Aldine Publishing Company, 1972).
3. M. F. Hammer , F. L. Mendez , M. P. Cox , A. E. Woerner , J. D. Wall , Sex-biased evolutionary forces shape genomic patterns of human diversity. PLoS Genet 4(9), e1000202 (2008).
4. Sexual Dimorphism, the Operational Sex Ratio, and the Intensity of Male Competition in Polygynous Primates
5. Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males;Proc. Royal Soc,2002
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献