Abstract
BackgroundExtracting the sample size from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains a challenge to developing better search functionalities or automating systematic reviews. Most current approaches rely on the sample size being explicitly mentioned in the abstract.Methods847 RCTs from high-impact medical journals were tagged with six different entities that could indicate the sample size. A named entity recognition (NER) model was trained to extract the entities and then deployed on a test set of 150 RCTs. The entities’ performance in predicting the actual number of trial participants who were randomized was assessed and possible combinations of the entities were evaluated to create predictive models.ResultsThe most accurate model could make predictions for 64.7% of trials in the test set, and the resulting predictions were within 10% of the ground truth in 96.9% of cases. A less strict model could make a prediction for 96.0% of trials, and its predictions were within 10% of the ground truth in 88.2% of cases.ConclusionTraining a named entity recognition model to predict the sample size from randomized controlled trials is feasible, not only if the sample size is explicitly mentioned but also if the sample size can be calculated, e.g., by adding up the number of patients in each arm.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference14 articles.
1. Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center
2. Vaswani A , Shazeer NM , Parmar N , et al. Attention is All you Need. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. Published online June 12, 2017:5998–6008.
3. Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain;Syst Rev,2024
4. Beltagy I , Lo K , Cohan A. SciBERT: A pretrained language model for scientific text. arXiv [csCL]. Published online March 26, 2019. https://github.com/allenai/scibert/
5. Trialstreamer: A living, automatically updated database of clinical trial reports;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2020