Abstract
AbstractBackgroundPelvic health conditions significantly impact quality of life and are prevalent in the general population. Urinary and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and pelvic pain are examples of pelvic health conditions. A scoping review was conducted to understand what is currently known about pelvic health conditions experienced by Indigenous populations worldwide. To date, no such review has been reported.MethodsA scoping review methodology was used. In June 2023, a search was conducted, and then updated in February 2024, capturing both primary and grey literature. An iterative process of abstract and full text screening was conducted by two reviewers before proceeding to data extraction. Inclusion criteria focused on English publications and reports of pelvic health conditions experienced by Indigenous peoples. Data was collected in Google Sheets, and then underwent descriptive statistical analysis. Publications that provided qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 203 publications were included in the analysis. Several patterns emerged regarding publication region, gender and age representation, pelvic health conditions reported, and representation of Indigenous peoples. Notable gaps were a lack of publications from China, Russia, and Nordic countries, minimal representation of gender diverse populations, few publications reporting on auto-immune and bowel conditions, and limited mention of trauma-informed and culturally safe approaches.ConclusionsThis study highlights gaps in the current literature around gender representation, bowel and auto-immune conditions, regional representation, and the use of safety frameworks, which may inform future research initiatives. It also summarizes the existing literature, which may inform clinical and health system-level decision making.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference85 articles.
1. Bradbury-Jones C , Aveyard H , Herber OR , Isham L , Taylor J , O’Malley L . Scoping reviews: The PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2021;
2. United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. Indigenous peoples, Indigenous voices factsheet: Who are indigenous peoples? [Internet]. Available from: https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/5session_factsheet1.pdf
3. Nguyen NH , Subhan FB , Williams K , Chan CB . Barriers and mitigating strategies to healthcare access in Indigenous communities of Canada: A narrative review. Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 1;8(2).
4. Induction of SARS-CoV-2-Specific IgG and IgA in Serum and Milk with Different SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Breastfeeding Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Northern Spain
5. Sannhet og forsoning – grunnlag for et oppgjør med fornorskingspolitikk og urett mot samer, kvener/norskfinner og skogfinner [Internet]. 2023 Jan. Available from: https://www.stortinget.no/globalassets/pdf/sannhets--og-forsoningskommisjonen/rapport-til-stortinget-fra-sannhets--og-forsoningskommisjonen.pdf